Jobs Budget 2.0 – What They’re Saying

What are some Ohioans saying about Governor Kasich’s proposed Jobs Budget 2.0?

Richard K. Vedder, Professor of Economics at Ohio University and Former Senior Economist at the U.S. Joint Economic Committee: “Governor Kasich’s tax proposals are welcome, because they address Ohio’s biggest long term problem, sluggish growth in job opportunities and incomes. Despite some meaningful improvements in the past three years, Ohio still has income levels below the national average, and too many of our best and brightest youth are leaving the Buckeye State for greener pastures elsewhere. As Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson have recently demonstrated, productive people are repelled by high state income taxes, and the 20 percent reduction in the Ohio income tax over three years is particularly important for the state’s future development, helping to close a gap with neighbors like Indiana and Michigan. The sales tax proposal likewise broadens the base and lowers the rate. The base broadening is desirable because it both reduces distortions in economic activity and probably reduces the regressive nature of the tax, making it fairer as well. The proposal to increase severance taxes is reasonable given the changes in energy technology, and will not kill the advantages we can derive from fracking and other new innovations–and will help finance the income tax reduction.  On the whole, this is a bold, pro-growth tax proposal that I hope is enacted into law by the Ohio General Assembly.”

Tony Caporale, Professor of Economics and Finance at the University of Dayton: “Governor Kasich’s proposed tax changes seem designed to try to jump start state economic growth.  The proposed 20% reduction in the state tax rate should increase Ohio’s competiveness and lead to an expansion in employment and income.  Economic theory and empirical evidence tells us that the true cost of a tax is not amount paid but the amount not paid (or avoided).  The cost of taxing work, income, and investment is that it leads to less work, income and investment.  An Ohio income tax cut should reduce these distortions to job growth and business expansion.  Therefore, there would be a benefit to a tax reduction even if Ohio were a low tax state in our region.  The fact that several bordering states have lower taxes makes the case for tax cuts even stronger.  Capital is very mobile, and business and jobs will flow to the states where they are less penalized.  The reduction in the sales tax rate is also welcomed.  Although sales taxes are a direct tax on spending, they economically serve as a tax on current and future income and wealth.  Having these rates lowered should also help make Ohio a more attractive place to do business.  Given budget constraints these tax reductions are partially financed by the proposed increase in severance taxes on oil and gas exploration (fracking).  As long as Ohio’s tax treatment is largely on par with other states the proposed change seems unlikely to kill or seriously damage this burgeoning new industry.  Overall, the proposals seem like a good policy mix.”

Mark Partridge, Rural-Urban Policy Professor at The Ohio State University: “The Governor’s proposal is a good first step to ensure that all Ohioans benefit from the current energy boom. It guarantees that Ohio’s energy industry remains competitive against all other producing states. The proposed changes to the income tax will help the competitiveness of Ohio’s businesses across the overall economy, enhancing economic growth for the benefit of the state.”

Scott Shane, Professor of Economics, Case Western Reserve University: “When it comes to formulating policies to help small business owners create jobs and generate economic growth, few elected officials go beyond the platitudes. That’s why the budget plan put forth by Ohio’s governor, John Kasich, is intriguing. It offers three components for unleashing the power of small business that can serve as a model for other elected officials interested in enhancing small business hiring and its contribution to economic growth.  Cutting taxes on income earned from investing in small businesses is an important component to stimulating the small business sector because many growth-oriented small business owners need to obtain capital from other sources to expand. This policy shift will encourage angel investors and others not actively involved in the businesses in which they invest to provide more capital to small business owners, making it easier for small company owners to get the money they need to grow their businesses.”

The Ohio Manufacturers’ Association: “The OMA commends Governor Kasich and his team for putting on the table a bold personal income tax reform proposal that, if enacted, would facilitate investment, growth and job creation in Ohio’s manufacturing sector. In particular, the Governor’s proposal to reduce by 50 percent the personal income tax on the first $750,000 of income of the owners of ‘pass through’ entities is truly innovative and could have a significant positive impact. The effect of this specific proposal would be to free up much-needed working capital for small businesses across Ohio, increasing job-creating investment in those companies. The proposed personal income tax reduction also would help entrepreneurs in early-stage businesses where the risks are high and working capital often is in short supply.”

One Response to Jobs Budget 2.0 – What They’re Saying

  1. Howard Etchell February 8, 2013 at 10:11 am #

    Lowering the tax rates, raised in the early 1980’s, will not bring back many of the people who have left when they departed to live for free in lower taxing states instead of paying the higher taxes in Ohio. Why? Most have died. I guess when the income taxes were raised in the 80’s no one assumed the residence departure, but it happened. If that was not bad enough, I have to assume, back in the early 80’s, there was little thought given to the fact the higher tax rates would keep people, industries, and tax paying entities from entering the state. Yes lowering the taxes is a good idea. I trust your real goal is to bring back the 1970’s tax rates.

Leave a Reply